Aortic dissection nursing: BP arm differential, Stanford type, and beta-blocker sequencing

Aortic dissection is one of the most lethal cardiovascular emergencies a nurse will encounter. Untreated Type A dissection has a classic early mortality of 1–2% per hour after symptom onset, the figure the 2022 ACC/AHA aortic disease guideline still quotes, and contemporary registry data put death at nearly 1 in 4 within 48 hours when surgery is not performed – meaning the window for life-saving intervention is narrow and the quality of nursing assessment directly shapes patient outcomes. Recognizing the signature presentation (sudden, severe tearing chest pain, often with a blood pressure differential between arms), applying the Stanford classification correctly, and initiating the right interventions without delay are skills every nursing student and practicing nurse must internalize.

This reference covers pathophysiology, Stanford and DeBakey classification, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostics, medical and surgical management, nursing priorities, and NCLEX-tested pearls. Use it alongside the hypertension nursing reference (the leading modifiable risk factor), the MI and ACS nursing reference (the critical chest pain differential), and the pulmonary embolism nursing reference for the broader acute chest pain framework.

Quick reference summary

Pathophysiology: the false lumen

The aorta has three wall layers: the intima (inner lining), media (smooth muscle and elastic tissue), and adventitia (outer fibrous layer). In aortic dissection, a tear develops in the intima – typically from mechanical stress on a vessel wall already weakened by hypertension, connective tissue disease, or degeneration.

Once the intima tears, high-pressure blood enters the media and cleaves it longitudinally, creating a second channel called the false lumen. This false lumen can:

• Propagate distally – tracking toward the abdominal aorta and its branches, threatening mesenteric, renal, and iliac blood supply
• Propagate proximally (retrograde) – tracking back toward the aortic root, threatening the coronary ostia, the aortic valve, and the pericardial space

The true lumen (where blood normally flows) may be compressed by the expanding false lumen, producing organ ischemia in whatever territory that segment feeds. The false lumen itself may thrombose, partially or completely – which can either stabilize the dissection or cause further obstruction.

The key hemodynamic principle: the greater the shear stress on the aortic wall (driven by high blood pressure and rapid heart rate), the faster the dissection propagates and the higher the rupture risk. This is why immediate heart rate and blood pressure control is the central medical priority.

Classification systems

Stanford classification (the one NCLEX tests)

The Stanford system is the clinically dominant classification because it directly drives the management decision.

The rule: any involvement of the ascending aorta = Type A = surgery. The location of the tear is less important than what structures are at risk proximally.

DeBakey classification

The DeBakey system is older and more anatomically granular. It is less commonly tested on NCLEX but appears in clinical documentation and cardiothoracic surgery contexts.

Types I and II map to Stanford A (surgical management). Type III maps to Stanford B (medical management, with endovascular intervention for complications).

Risk factors

Uncontrolled hypertension is the single most important risk factor, present in about 7 of 10 patients in IRAD’s first cohort. Sustained high blood pressure accelerates medial degeneration and dramatically increases aortic wall shear stress.

Modifiable risk factors:

• Hypertension (the #1 cause – chronic and poorly controlled)
• Cocaine and methamphetamine use (acute hypertensive surges)
• Cigarette smoking (accelerates atherosclerosis and medial degeneration)
• Atherosclerosis (though less commonly associated than with aneurysms)

Non-modifiable / structural risk factors:

• Marfan syndrome – fibrillin-1 gene mutation leads to cystic medial necrosis; presents at a younger age (often 30s–40s); should prompt aortic surveillance
• Bicuspid aortic valve – associated with aortic root dilation and medial abnormalities even in the absence of valve dysfunction
• Turner syndrome – associated with aortic coarctation and bicuspid valve
• Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vascular type) – defective collagen synthesis
• Loeys-Dietz syndrome – connective tissue disorder with aggressive aortic disease

Situational risk factors:

• Pregnancy – hemodynamic and hormonal changes raise risk, mostly in women with an underlying aortopathy (Marfan, Loeys-Dietz, vascular Ehlers-Danlos, Turner); most pregnancy-related dissections occur in the third trimester or up to 12 weeks postpartum
• Trauma (blunt aortic injury from deceleration – typically at the aortic isthmus)
• Aortic instrumentation or cardiac surgery

Clinical presentation

The signature chest pain

The textbook description is sudden-onset severe chest pain that is tearing or ripping in quality. In practice, patients more often describe abrupt, severe “sharp” or “stabbing” pain in the chest, back, or abdomen, according to both IRAD and the 2022 ACC/AHA guideline, so do not wait for the word “tearing” before escalating. The pain is maximal at onset – the patient often recalls the exact moment it started. This distinguishes aortic dissection from myocardial infarction, where ischemic pain typically builds over minutes as the coronary thrombus occludes.

Pain location correlates with dissection extent:

• Anterior chest pain – suggests involvement of the ascending aorta (Type A)
• Interscapular or back pain – suggests involvement of the descending aorta (Type B); pain may radiate from chest to back as the dissection propagates
• Abdominal pain – suggests extension toward the abdominal aorta

Some patients, particularly those with Marfan syndrome or prior aortic surgery, present atypically with no pain (painless dissection) – making high clinical suspicion in high-risk populations essential.

Blood pressure differential between arms

A difference in systolic blood pressure greater than 20 mmHg between the right and left arms is a classic and high-yield sign of dissection involving the great vessels. The dissection can compress or involve the innominate or left subclavian artery, reducing perfusion pressure on the affected side.

It is a red flag, and its weakness is sensitivity. Older references (and many NCLEX review products) call the arm differential pathognomonic. When present, a pulse or BP differential is a strong finding: Klompas’s 2002 JAMA review gives a positive likelihood ratio of 5.7, and in von Kodolitsch’s prediction study an isolated pulse or BP differential put the probability of dissection at 83% or higher. The problem is that it is often absent. Only about 31% of patients in the Klompas review had a pulse deficit or BP differential, and IRAD recorded a pulse deficit in 15% and an aortic regurgitation murmur in 32%. Equal blood pressures in both arms do not exclude aortic dissection, and a nurse who treats them as reassurance in a patient with sudden tearing chest pain has made the single most dangerous error in this presentation.

Critical nursing action: measure blood pressure in both arms and palpate all peripheral pulses. Document both readings and any deficit. Use the higher reading for treatment targets. Escalate on the history and the pain character even when the arm pressures match.

Additional signs and symptoms

• Pulse deficits – diminished or absent radial, femoral, or carotid pulses on one side
• Hypertension in the presenting arms (though hypotension suggests rupture or tamponade)
• Aortic regurgitation murmur – high-pitched diastolic murmur if the dissection undermines the aortic valve
• Neurological deficits – stroke-like symptoms if carotid arteries are involved; spinal cord ischemia (paraplegia) if anterior spinal artery is compromised
• Syncope – suggests hemopericardium or acute severe aortic regurgitation
• Diaphoresis, pallor, and anxiety – reflex responses to pain and hemodynamic stress

Complications

Aortic dissection can produce life-threatening complications depending on which aortic segments and branch vessels are involved. These map closely to the downstream structures at risk.

Cardiovascular:

• Aortic regurgitation – the dissection separates the aortic valve leaflets from their commissural supports, causing acute severe AR; listen for a new diastolic murmur; can precipitate acute heart failure
• Pericardial tamponade – blood leaks into the pericardial space from a ruptured ascending aorta; presents with Beck’s triad (hypotension, muffled heart sounds, JVD); life-threatening; see the pericarditis nursing reference
• Myocardial infarction – dissection extending to the coronary ostia (most commonly the right coronary artery) occludes coronary flow; can produce inferior STEMI on top of the dissection – thrombolytics would be catastrophic

Neurological:

• Stroke – involvement of the carotid or vertebral arteries; any new focal neurological deficit in a patient with aortic dissection must be assessed urgently; see the stroke nursing reference
• Spinal cord ischemia – anterior spinal artery occlusion produces paraplegia or paraparesis; more common in Type B

Visceral and renal:

• Mesenteric ischemia – celiac or superior mesenteric artery involvement; presents with severe abdominal pain, peritoneal signs; high mortality
• Renal failure – renal artery involvement; monitor urine output closely; oliguria is a danger sign
• Limb ischemia – iliac or femoral artery involvement; assess peripheral pulses, capillary refill, and limb temperature bilaterally

Any new symptom in a dissection patient – neurological change, abdominal pain, oliguria, absent pulse – should be treated as potential propagation or branch vessel occlusion until proven otherwise.

Diagnostics

CT angiography (gold standard)

CT angiography (CTA) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis with IV contrast is the first-line diagnostic test for suspected aortic dissection (Class 1 in the 2022 ACC/AHA guideline, chosen for its availability, accuracy, and speed). It can:

• Identify the intimal flap and false lumen
• Define the extent of dissection (ascending vs descending, branch vessel involvement)
• Detect pericardial effusion and pleural hemorrhage
• Provide anatomical roadmap for surgical planning

Sensitivity and specificity both approach 95–100% with modern multidetector CT scanners.

Chest X-ray

CXR is often the first imaging obtained. A widened mediastinum (greater than 8 cm at the level of the aortic knob) is the classic finding. The 2022 ACC/AHA guideline states that the CXR is neither sensitive nor specific enough to diagnose acute aortic syndrome, and 12.4% of IRAD patients had no CXR abnormality at all. Other findings include:

• Irregular or indistinct aortic knob contour
• Tracheal deviation to the right, or rightward deviation of a nasogastric tube
• “Calcium sign” – intimal calcification displaced more than 5 mm from the outer aortic wall
• Left-sided pleural effusion (hemothorax from dissection leak)
• Cardiomegaly (pericardial effusion)

A normal CXR does not exclude aortic dissection. If clinical suspicion is high, proceed directly to CTA.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)

TEE is a reasonable alternative to CT (Class 2a), and it is the usual choice when the patient is too unstable to travel to CT or has a contrast contraindication; it can be done at the bedside or in the operating room. The transesophageal probe sits adjacent to the aorta in the esophagus, providing high-resolution images of the ascending aorta, aortic root, and aortic valve. Limitations: less accurate for the distal ascending aorta (tracheal air interference) and requires sedation.

MRI

MRI provides excellent anatomical detail and no radiation exposure, but its use is limited in the acute setting because:

• Scan time is too long for an unstable patient
• Monitoring is difficult in the MRI environment
• Most emergency departments do not have immediate MRI availability

MRI is most often used for follow-up, and it may be the study of choice for a stable patient who cannot receive iodinated contrast.

Other diagnostics

• ECG – performed immediately to exclude STEMI and identify arrhythmias; may show LVH (from chronic hypertension), non-specific ST-T changes, or inferior ST changes if right coronary ostia are involved; see the EKG interpretation cheat sheet
• Troponin – will be elevated if the dissection has caused coronary involvement; important to interpret in context, not in isolation
• BMP/CBC/coagulation studies – baseline renal function, hematocrit, and coagulation status before surgery or intervention
• Type and crossmatch – essential before surgical repair

Clinical differentiation: aortic dissection vs MI vs PE

One of the highest-yield NCLEX tasks is distinguishing between the three major chest pain emergencies. Each has a distinct profile.

Medical management (all acute dissections, definitive for uncomplicated Type B)

Every patient with acute aortic syndrome gets immediate anti-impulse therapy, including Type A patients awaiting surgery. In uncomplicated Stanford Type B dissection, medical therapy is the Class 1 initial strategy. The goal is to reduce aortic wall shear stress by targeting two hemodynamic parameters simultaneously: heart rate and blood pressure.

Heart rate control comes first. Beta-blockers reduce the force and rate of ventricular ejection (dP/dt), which is the primary driver of shear stress on the dissected aortic wall. The 2022 ACC/AHA aortic disease guideline gives IV beta-blockade a Class 1 recommendation as initial therapy in acute aortic syndrome unless contraindicated, with an arterial line and ICU-level monitoring also Class 1.

Know the current targets. The 2022 guideline (Class 1) sets a heart rate of 60–80 bpm and a systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg, or the lowest pressure that still maintains end-organ perfusion. This is a relaxation of the 2010 ACCF/AHA thoracic aortic disease guideline, which specified a heart rate under 60. Many institutional protocols and review resources still teach the older “HR less than 60” figure, and some units continue to titrate toward the lower end of the current range – so expect to see both. What has not changed is the principle underneath: slow the rate and blunt the ejection force before touching afterload.

Blood pressure control follows. Once heart rate is controlled, IV vasodilators are added (Class 1) if pressure remains above target. The guideline says vasodilators should be avoided as initial treatment, because starting one before a beta-blocker or rate-controlling calcium channel blocker can trigger reflex tachycardia and paradoxically increase shear stress – the opposite of what is needed.

Preferred agents:

• Labetalol IV – combined alpha- and beta-blocker; reduces both heart rate and blood pressure with a single agent; a common first choice; given as IV boluses or infusion (IV metoprolol is the other beta-blocker the guideline names)
• Esmolol IV – ultra-short-acting cardioselective beta-blocker; easily titratable; preferred when rapid dose adjustment is needed or when labetalol is contraindicated
• Diltiazem or verapamil IV (non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) – the rate-control alternative when beta-blockers are contraindicated or not tolerated (Class 2a); the guideline lists acute aortic regurgitation, heart block, and bradycardia as reasons for caution with beta-blockers
• Nicardipine or clevidipine IV (dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) – vasodilators added after heart rate is controlled; they do not slow the heart and can cause reflex tachycardia if given first
• Nitroprusside IV – potent vasodilator; must never be used alone without heart rate control in place; used in refractory hypertension

Pain management: IV opioids are used for analgesia (pain control is Class 1 in the 2022 guideline). Adequate pain control also helps reduce the sympathetic surge that elevates blood pressure. The guideline cautions that IV NSAIDs such as ketorolac may be unsuitable because they can raise blood pressure and harm the kidneys.

Complicated Type B dissection – rupture, branch artery occlusion or malperfusion, extension of the dissection, rapid aortic expansion, or refractory pain or hypertension – requires intervention (Class 1). With rupture and suitable anatomy, endovascular repair is recommended over open surgery; for other complications it is reasonable. For uncomplicated Type B with high-risk features (for example, aortic diameter over 40 mm, false lumen over 20–22 mm, or entry tear over 10 mm), TEVAR may be considered (Class 2b). Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) deploys a stent graft in the descending aorta to cover the intimal tear, redirect flow into the true lumen, and promote false lumen thrombosis.

Surgical management (Type A)

Stanford Type A dissection requires emergency surgical consultation and immediate surgery (Class 1). The risk of death, tamponade, stroke, or aortic rupture is too high to manage medically.

The standard operative approach is open surgical repair:

1. Cardiopulmonary bypass to take over cardiac function
2. Hypothermic circulatory arrest for the arch portion, usually with antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion; the 2022 guideline notes cerebral perfusion improves neurologic outcomes compared with deep hypothermic arrest alone
3. Resection of the intimal tear in the ascending aorta
4. Replacement of the ascending aorta with a Dacron graft
5. Reconstruction or replacement of the aortic root if the valve or coronary ostia are involved (Bentall procedure)
6. If arch involvement requires it, hemiarch or total arch replacement

Postoperative nursing priorities: continuous hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU, assessment for neurological deficits (stroke, spinal cord ischemia), monitoring of urine output (renal ischemia), chest tube management, vigilance for bleeding or coagulopathy, and serial ECGs to detect coronary complications.

Medical management (antihypertensives, pain control) continues perioperatively and becomes lifelong after surgical repair. All patients with aortic dissection – regardless of type – require long-term blood pressure control and serial aortic imaging.

Nursing priorities and interventions

The nursing assessment and interventions for aortic dissection are high-acuity, time-sensitive, and require simultaneous monitoring across multiple organ systems.

Patient and family education

Patient education in the acute phase is limited by severity of illness, pain, and anxiety. Focus on brief, reassuring explanations. Once the patient is stabilized (post-surgery or medically managed Type B), education priorities include:

Blood pressure control is lifelong. The underlying aortic vulnerability does not resolve after treatment. Patients must understand that uncontrolled hypertension dramatically increases the risk of redissection or aortic rupture. Antihypertensive adherence is non-negotiable.

Medication compliance. Most patients will be discharged on a long-term beta-blocker (Class 1), with an ACE inhibitor or ARB added as needed for blood pressure. The 2022 guideline advises avoiding long-term calcium channel blockers in Marfan syndrome unless they are needed to reach the BP target. Explain the rationale: these drugs protect the aorta by reducing the force of blood flow. Stopping them abruptly is dangerous.

Symptom recognition and return precautions. Any recurrence of severe, sudden chest or back pain warrants immediate emergency evaluation – no “wait and see.” Redissection can occur months or years after the initial event.

Activity modification. Heavy isometric exercise (weightlifting, straining) generates acute blood pressure spikes. Patients should discuss safe activity levels with their cardiothoracic surgeon and cardiologist before resuming exercise.

Follow-up imaging. The 2022 ACC/AHA guideline recommends CT or MRI at 1, 6, and 12 months, then annually if stable, to monitor for aneurysmal dilation of the false lumen or extension of the dissection. Patients should not miss these appointments.

Genetic referral. Patients with Marfan syndrome, bicuspid aortic valve, or a family history of aortic dissection should be referred for genetic counseling and family screening.

NCLEX tips

The following are specific testing traps and high-yield clinical pearls that NCLEX uses to separate students who understand aortic dissection from those who have only memorized it.

• Type A vs Type B is the management key. If ascending aorta is involved → surgery, no matter what else. If descending only → medical management unless complicated. This distinction appears on nearly every aortic dissection NCLEX question.

• Pain maximal at onset = think dissection. Crushing pain that builds = MI. If the question uses “sudden, severe, tearing” or “worst pain of my life, started immediately” – think dissection first. At the bedside, patients more often say “sharp” or “stabbing”.

• BP differential between arms >20 mmHg is the classic sign, and NCLEX tests it directly – but know its real limits. Always measure both arms, document both readings, and use the higher one for treatment. Many review products label the differential “pathognomonic”; the evidence does not support that, since a pulse or BP differential appears in only about a third of confirmed dissections. Answer the exam question with the classic association, and carry the clinical caveat to the bedside: equal arm pressures never rule dissection out.

• Widened mediastinum on CXR >8 cm is the classic radiographic finding. If a question shows an X-ray finding + tearing chest pain, the answer is almost certainly aortic dissection requiring emergent CTA. A normal CXR does not exclude it.

• Never give thrombolytics. If a patient presents with chest pain, ST changes, and a history that could be dissection – do not give tPA or alteplase. The consequence is massive, often fatal hemorrhage into the dissection plane. NCLEX will test this specifically as a “what should you not do” question.

• Beta-blocker before vasodilator. The pharmacological sequence matters. If you give a vasodilator first, reflex tachycardia increases wall shear stress. Start with labetalol or esmolol to control heart rate (diltiazem or verapamil if beta-blockers are contraindicated), then add a vasodilator such as nicardipine or nitroprusside if needed. Current targets are HR 60–80 bpm and SBP under 120 mmHg per the 2022 ACC/AHA guideline; older material citing “HR less than 60” reflects the superseded 2010 guideline.

• Type A mortality: know the classic 1–2% per hour. It comes from historical series, still appears in the 2022 ACC/AHA guideline and in rationale explanations, and justifies emergent surgical dispatch. Contemporary IRAD data (Harris 2022) found 0.5% per hour, or 23.7% at 48 hours, in patients who did not have surgery, against 4.4% with intended surgery. Either way, time to the operating room is the variable that matters.

• Coronary artery involvement causes MI-like findings. RCA is the most commonly affected coronary ostium in proximal dissection. Expect inferior ST changes on ECG. But the underlying problem is still dissection – not primary ACS. Thrombolytics remain contraindicated even with ST elevation.

• Marfan syndrome = younger patient. If the NCLEX stem describes a tall, thin patient in their 30s or 40s with aortic dissection, Marfan syndrome is the expected underlying condition. These patients require aortic surveillance even when asymptomatic.

• Atrial fibrillation can occur as a consequence of hemopericardium, aortic root stretching, or myocardial ischemia. Recognize aortic dissection as a cause of new-onset atrial fibrillation in the context of severe chest pain.

• Oliguria = renal artery involvement until proven otherwise. Hourly urine output monitoring is not optional – it is the earliest bedside indicator of renal malperfusion. Report output <0.5 mL/kg/hr immediately.

• Pain relief matters hemodynamically. Uncontrolled pain drives catecholamine release → raises HR and BP → increases shear stress → accelerates dissection. Treating pain is not just comfort – it is cardiovascular management. This is a high-yield rationale question type.

Putting it together: clinical decision framework

When a patient presents with sudden-onset tearing chest pain, apply this mental framework:

1. Immediate assessment – vital signs in both arms, bilateral pulse check, neurological status, 12-lead ECG, IV access
2. Notify the team immediately – this is a time-critical emergency; do not wait for imaging results to escalate
3. Rapid stabilization – oxygen, cardiac monitoring, arterial line, urinary catheter, NPO, analgesia
4. Imaging – CTA chest/abdomen/pelvis if the patient can travel (a portable CXR may come first, but a normal film never cancels the CTA); bedside TEE if too unstable
5. Stanford classification – once confirmed, the classification drives everything: Type A to the OR, Type B to the ICU for medical management
6. Pharmacological management – start IV beta-blocker immediately for every confirmed or strongly suspected dissection, Type A included; continue through the perioperative period
7. Monitor for complications – new neurological deficits, pulse deficits, oliguria, worsening pain, and hemodynamic instability all signal propagation or branch vessel compromise

The shock nursing reference is relevant for dissections complicated by rupture, tamponade, or acute severe aortic regurgitation – all of which can produce cardiogenic or obstructive shock requiring aggressive resuscitation. The infective endocarditis nursing reference provides context for the broader spectrum of acute aortic valve pathology that can produce similar cardiac emergency presentations.

Aortic dissection rewards the nurse who knows what to look for and acts without hesitation. The combination of clinical pattern recognition – tearing pain, arm BP differential, widened mediastinum – and rapid, protocol-driven intervention is what saves lives in this condition.

References

1. Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3538–3700. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179
2. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000;283(7):897–903. doi:10.1001/jama.283.7.897
3. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(14):e27–e129. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.015 (superseded by ref 10; cited for the older HR target)
4. Mészáros I, Mórocz J, Szlávi J, et al. Epidemiology and clinicopathology of aortic dissection. Chest. 2000;117(5):1271–1278. doi:10.1378/chest.117.5.1271
5. DeBakey ME, Henly WS, Cooley DA, Morris GC Jr, Crawford ES, Beall AC Jr. Surgical management of dissecting aneurysms of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1965;49:130–149.
6. Daily PO, Trueblood HW, Stinson EB, Wuerflein RD, Shumway NE. Management of acute aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg. 1970;10(3):237–247. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(10)65594-4
7. Nienaber CA, Clough RE. Management of acute aortic dissection. Lancet. 2015;385(9970):800–811. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61005-9
8. Harris KM, Nienaber CA, Peterson MD, et al. Early mortality in type A acute aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(10):1009–1015. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2718
9. Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E, et al. Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: a 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research. Circulation. 2018;137(17):1846–1860. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031264
10. Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(24):e223–e393. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004. Co-published in Circulation. 2022;146(24):e334–e482. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106
11. Mussa FF, Horton JD, Moridzadeh R, Nicholson J, Trimarchi S, Eagle KA. Acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma: a systematic review. JAMA. 2016;316(7):754–763. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.10026
12. Nienaber CA, Rousseau H, Eggebrecht H, et al. Randomized comparison of strategies for type B aortic dissection: the INvestigation of STEnt Grafts in Aortic Dissection (INSTEAD) trial. Circulation. 2009;120(25):2519–2528. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.886408
13. Tsai TT, Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes. Circulation. 2005;112(24):3802–3813. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.534198
14. Klompas M. Does this patient have an acute thoracic aortic dissection? JAMA. 2002;287(17):2262–2272. doi:10.1001/jama.287.17.2262
15. von Kodolitsch Y, Schwartz AG, Nienaber CA. Clinical prediction of acute aortic dissection. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(19):2977–2982. doi:10.1001/archinte.160.19.2977